Frequently asked questions

Traffic is tiered using historical cohort performance, disclosure completeness, and automated ShieldCheck™ signals. New partners ramp under monitored caps with human account review; postbacks reconcile against device graphs and behavioral baselines before budgets scale—so you fund outcomes, not uncertainty.

ShieldCheck™ is our proprietary anti-fraud umbrella: rules-and-risk scoring on installs, leads, and sales; vendor and first-party telemetry; and review queues where models disagree. Evidence-rich dispute workflows keep decisions transparent for advertisers and remediation paths clear for publishers—defense-in-depth without choking compliant volume.

Enterprise programs commonly align on net-30 or net-45 invoicing with weekly performance statements and dispute-ready logs. High-trust relationships may negotiate accelerated reconciliation once baseline quality is proven. Your partnerships lead documents caps, settlement cadence, and any performance incentives in writing during onboarding.

Yes. We expose programmatic interfaces for offer metadata, pacing, performance pulls, and postback configuration where your stack requires it—so finance, BI, and marketing operations share one reconcilable source of truth. Integration patterns are scoped with your technical team to match latency, security, and audit requirements.

Dashboards are built for export and audit: placement-class disclosure where applicable, sub-source visibility within policy, and cohort views that tie spend to downstream events. Our thirteen-year operating history (2013–2026) informs which fields matter when reconciliations—and regulator questions—inevitably arrive.

We begin with vertical fit, risk appetite, and measurement integrity; then we sequence traffic tests with explicit success criteria before scaling. Account leadership coordinates compliance, creative, and technical workstreams so launches stay disciplined rather than reactive.